Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l. Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment: A Comparative Assessment 2019-03-18

Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l Rating: 6,2/10 1305 reviews

Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment (eBook, 2011) [pfactory.in]

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

With the pressing need to mitigate climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the fossil energy industry is exploring the possibility of carbon dioxide disposal in geological media. The investment costs are significant and mid-course corrections are expensive; hence, both technologies need stable regulatory systems. An example is provided of how one method being used to monitor the behaviour of carbon dioxide in the subsurface could be adapted to monitor radioactive waste. Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and that of radioactive waste gives rise to many common concerns in domains ranging from geology to public acceptance. In this respect, comparative assessments reveal many similarities, ranging from the transformation of the geological environment and safety and monitoring concerns to regulatory, liability and public acceptance issues.

Next

Ferenc L. Toth: Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment (PDF)

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and that of radioactive waste gives rise to many common concerns in domains ranging from geology to public acceptance. The most meaningful indicator for comparison is the disposal cost per unit of electricity produced. Separate institutions address carbon dioxide storage and radioactive waste, and currently there is little interaction between them. It sets out the protection objectives and criteria for geological disposal and establishes the requirements that must be met to ensure the safety of this disposal option, consistent with the established principles of safety for radioactive waste management. Fossil fuels will remain the backbone of the global energy economy for the foreseeable future.

Next

Ferenc L. Toth: Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment (PDF)

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

With the pressing need to mitigate climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the fossil energy industry is exploring the possibility of carbon dioxide disposal in geological media. We recall first the fundamentals of porous media and the transport mechanisms of solutes and gas in geological formations. A map showing suitable areas for nuclear waste storage is presented. Report prepared by Pöyry Energy Limited. The comparative assessment reveals important differences between the two waste products in the volume of material involved and the precautions to be taken that determine the cost per kWh indicator. This book investigates the concept of geological disposal and examines the wide range of natural analogues which have been studied.

Next

The Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

Geological disposal has been studied for decades by the nuclear industry with a view to ensuring the safe containment of its wastes. It is observed that entropy generation characteristics of the enclosure closely follow the above-mentioned regime demarcation. Geological disposal has been studied for decades by the nuclear industry with a view to ensuring the safe containment of its wastes. Furthermore, we discuss group differences i. These two global characteristics: 1 characteristics centered on the natural aspects of the site and 2 characteristics centered on the technological aspects of the Project, have been evaluated through user input of Property values, which define Attributes, which define the Characteristics.

Next

The Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

Geological disposal has been studied for decades by the nuclear industry with a view to ensuring the safe containment of its wastes. One of the challenges facing the nuclear industry is to demonstrate confidently that a repository will contain wastes for so long that any releases that might take place in the future will pose no significant health or environmental risk. The relative importance of the associated electricity generation technologies coal-based and nuclear generation varies across countries but extensive efforts are under way to explore the feasibility of and available capacities for disposing of the resulting waste. With the pressing need to mitigate climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the fossil energy industry is exploring the possibility of carbon dioxide disposal in geological media. The book's second aim is to discuss the expanding application of natural analogues for non-performance assessment purposes, especially their potential for presenting the concept of geological disposal to various interested audiences in a coherent, understandable and scientifically legitimate manner. However, on a number of accounts such as the feed conditions of gas, its composition and process economics; natural gas sweetening and carbon capture are very different applications.

Next

[Review sách] Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Romain Boniface and Karine Langlois for the initial literature survey, and Aurora Badulescu for her assistance in preparing this chapter. At present, natural gas sweetening is the most important application for this technology. The amount of spent fuel will reach about 82,000 t of heavy metal when all of the planned 58 reactors on the Chinese mainland reach the end of their lifetime. They are also indebted to Etienne Brosse, Bernard Neerdael, Jürgen Kupitz, Tim McEwen, Julia West and two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions for improving the various drafts. However, because of the large differences between transport chains, safety standards are specific to each system.

Next

Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

In this study we cite over 90 references covering the main literature published on this topic over the last decade. Many of the principles involved are generally applicable to other repository options e. The scope of the cost assessments covers a range of activities from research, site identification, licensing and construction to operation, closure and post-closure monitoring of the disposal sites. RognerIntroductory chapterComparing the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: Introduction and Overview Section A Thematic AssessmentsGeological Media and Factors for the Long-term Emplacement and Isolation of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Environmental Issues in the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Risk Assessment, Risk Management and Remediation for the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Storage of Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Methods Used to Identify the Migration of Carbon Dioxide and Radionuclides in the Geosphere Transport of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Engineering Challenges in the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Carbon Dioxide The Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Managing Liability: Comparing Radioactive Waste Disposal and Carbon Dioxide Storage Public Acceptance of Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: Similarities and Differences Comparative Ethical Issues Entailed in the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Carbon Dioxide in the Light of Climate Change Psychological Perspectives on the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Carbon Dioxide Section B Regional AssessmentsComparative Assessment of Status and Opportunities for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage and Radioactive Waste Disposal in North America Comparing the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in Western Europe Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in Central and Eastern Europe: A Regional Overview of Geological Storage and Disposal Potential Comparison of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in European Russia Comparison between Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in China Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in the Geotectonically Active Country of Japan The Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide and Disposal of Nuclear Waste in South Africa Assessment of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in Brazil, and Some Comparative Aspects of their Disposal in Argentina Index Series Title: , 44. The comparative assessment reveals important differences between the two waste products in the volume of material involved and the precautions to be taken that determine the cost per kWh indicator.

Next

Download [PDF] Geological Disposal Of Radioactive Waste Free Online

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

This affects the way that risk assessments are undertaken and uncertainties managed. The former has been studied to some extent, however, understanding of the latter is very limited. However, there are profound differences on a broad range of issues as well, such as the quantities and hazardous features of the materials to be disposed of, the characteristics of the targeted geological media, the site engineering technologies involved and the timescales required for safe containment at the disposal location. The qualitative risk assessment tool developed in this work is based on the approach that shale gas exploitation risk is dependent on both the geologic site and the technological aspects. KeywordsGeological prediction-Induced earthquake-Microbubbles-Tectonic stability-Site selection South Africa has a coal-based energy economy, and the use of coal is likely to increase as new coal-fired electricity generation stations and coal-to-liquids plants are built. Significant progress has been made in both areas.

Next

Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

Nuclear waste is currently a significant political issue in Western Europe and North America and is becoming increasingly important in all other countries with existing or planned nuclear programmes. The proposed model has been applied to a site with potential for the exploitation of shale gas in Asturias northwestern Spain with tree different technological options to test the approach. Rogner Introductory chapter Comparing the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: Introduction and Overview Section A Thematic Assessments Geological Media and Factors for the Long-term Emplacement and Isolation of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Environmental Issues in the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Risk Assessment, Risk Management and Remediation for the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Storage of Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Methods Used to Identify the Migration of Carbon Dioxide and Radionuclides in the Geosphere Transport of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Engineering Challenges in the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Carbon Dioxide The Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste Managing Liability: Comparing Radioactive Waste Disposal and Carbon Dioxide Storage Public Acceptance of Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: Similarities and Differences Comparative Ethical Issues Entailed in the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Carbon Dioxide in the Light of Climate Change Psychological Perspectives on the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Carbon Dioxide Section B Regional Assessments Comparative Assessment of Status and Opportunities for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage and Radioactive Waste Disposal in North America Comparing the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in Western Europe Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in Central and Eastern Europe: A Regional Overview of Geological Storage and Disposal Potential Comparison of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in European Russia Comparison between Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in China Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in the Geotectonically Active Country of Japan The Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide and Disposal of Nuclear Waste in South Africa Assessment of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in Brazil, and Some Comparative Aspects of their Disposal in Argentina Index. Presently South Africa has one nuclear-powered electricity generation station which provides a mere 2. References Alter U, Götz C, Koch W, Mester W, Mohr S 2006 Management of radioactive waste and spent fuel, balance of reprocessing. This chapter looks at some of the general technologies used for monitoring the behaviour of these wastes in the subsurface and provides a general comparison of the methods used. There are ample opportunities to learn from comparisons and to derive insights that will assist policymakers responsible for national energy strategies and international climate policies.

Next

Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment (eBook, 2011) [pfactory.in]

geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste a comparative assessment toth ferenc l

The definition and characterization of disposal sites is a key question for the energy supply and the geopolitical and environmental security of all Latin American developing countries. The geological conditions of European Russia are described, and the regional features and locations suitable for nuclear waste disposal are identified. At the South African Climate Change Summit held during March 2009, it was announced that South Africa will increase its carbon dioxide emissions until 2020—2025, plateau for 10 years, and thereafter decrease emissions in real terms. This paper examines, respectively, the nuclear technologies available today 1 , the future perspectives for nuclear energy on a worldwide basis 2 and the controversial question of the management of nuclear waste and the insurability of risks 3. Carbon dioxide capture and storage is being investigated as a measure to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions: a Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage was established on 30 March 2009. There are ample opportunities to learn from comparisons and to derive insights that will assist policymakers responsible for national energy strategies and international climate policies.

Next